GPT-4.1 Is Great at Coding, But I Won’t Use It. Here’s Why!
Post Content
​ I tested GPT-4.1 on my own coding benchmark. Its impressive but the intelligence vs cost doesn’t justify to replace better options like Gemini-2.5 Pro from Google. Learn more here!
LINK:
https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-1/
https://cookbook.openai.com/examples/gpt4-1_prompting_guide
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GohNBLRWIAA4XGD?format=jpg&name=4096×4096
RAG Beyond Basics Course:
https://prompt-s-site.thinkific.com/courses/rag
Let’s Connect:
Discord: https://discord.com/invite/t4eYQRUcXB
Buy me a Coffee: https://ko-fi.com/promptengineering
|
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PromptEngineering
Consulting: https://calendly.com/engineerprompt/consulting-call
Business Contact: engineerprompt@gmail.com
Become Member: http://tinyurl.com/y5h28s6h
Pre-configured localGPT VM: https://bit.ly/localGPT (use Code: PromptEngineering for 50% off).
Signup for Newsletter, localgpt:
https://tally.so/r/3y9bb0
GPT-4 0.1 Coding Capabilities Tested | Comparisons & Performance Insights
In this video, we explore the coding capabilities of GPT-4.1, particularly in comparison to its predecessor GPT-4.0 and other models like Gemini 2.5 Pro and DeepSeek V3. We’ll perform a series of coding tests to assess its performance, including generating HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript code for websites, creating animations, and testing its web search functionality. While GPT-4.1 demonstrates impressive coding abilities and faster token generation, it falls short due to issues like hallucinations and cost inefficiencies. Ultimately, we conclude that though it’s a significant upgrade, better and cheaper alternatives exist. Tune in for detailed benchmarks and insights.
00:00 Introduction to GPT-4.1
01:00 Initial Coding Tests
03:04 Testing Specific Coding Capabilities
04:57 Exploring Web Search Tool Integration
09:24 Advanced Coding Challenges
15:08 Performance and Cost Analysis
18:02 Conclusion and Final Thoughts Read More Prompt Engineering
#AI #promptengineering
